Haslip v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 1992
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watkins v. Oklahoma · Benson v. State · Young v. Georgia · Henson v. Wyrick · Anderson v. Frey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is sometimes difficult to distinguish ‘mere trial errors’ from ‘trial errors affecting constitutional rights’ as the magnitude of the error may be the factor which controls.... An issue which could have been raised on appeal, even though a constitutional claim, should only be allowed in a post-conviction motion in rare and exceptional circumstances when required by fundamental fairness.” (Citing authority.) Haslip v. State, 717 S.W.2d 533 (Mo.App.1986)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Householder v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.