Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 SW2D 849 - State v. Kline

State v. Kline’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2010

4 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Commercial Bank of St. Louis County v. James · State v. McCloud · 33 Tex. Civ. App. 615 - Foster v. Ross and Ross, Executors · State Ex Rel. Hannah v. Seier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of review to determine whether the trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss requires that the information: (1) properly advise the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; (2) consist of a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged; (3) state facts which constitute the offense charged with reasonable certainty; and (4) make the averments so clear and distinct that there could be no difficulty in determining what evidence would be admissible under them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.