Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 717 SW2D 922 - Shockley v. State

Shockley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Bishop v. Wood · Carey v. Piphus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “good cause to believe that ... [Faerman] would not appear when his conviction becomes final or is likely to commit another offense while on bail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “interest in retaining liberty while his appeal is pending cannot be dismissed as insignificant ... [it is] a `substantial right.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “that due process requires that the trial court give notice and hold a hearing prior to the denial of bail pending appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.