Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 F.2d 1039 - Doe v. United States

Doe v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

718 F.2d 1039 · 1983

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2018

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Dalehite v. United States · Indian Towing Company v. United States · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the only incidents reported at the post office with criminal overtones did not involve actual or threatened injury to invitees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.