Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 F.2d 1048 - Devine v. Nutt

Devine v. Nutt’s Empirical Analysis

718 F.2d 1048 · 1983

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2002 · most notably Cornelius v. Nutt (1985), Devine v. Ra Sutermeister (1984)

2 federal appellate ·

220198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 31 U.S.C. § 1349 · 5 U.S.C. § 7106 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · South Corporation v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that OPM's position on the issues raised in the appeal may differ from those of either party to the arbitration ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “PROPOSED NOTICE: In the event an employee is issued a notice of proposed disciplinary or adverse action, that employee must be afforded and made aware of all his/her rights. These proposed notices shall be served on the employee(s) within a reasonable period of time (normally 40 calendar days) after the occurrence of the alleged offense or when the alleged offense becomes known to management.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The Employer agrees that during formal discussion where interrogation or written or sworn statements are taken from an employee, in connection with a charge that may result in disciplinary action against him, he will have the opportunity to have a representative present. It should be understood that counseling sessions are not formal discussions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.