Sidney v. Zah’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 1453 · 1983
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Western Systems, Inc. v. Ulloa (1992), International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Pension, Welfare & Training Trust Funds v. Karr (1993)
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 640D (Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Amendments) · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D
Relies on Montana v. United States · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Hansberry v. Lee · Michel v. United States · United States v. Mazurie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(I) whether rights or interests established in the prior judgment would be destroyed or impaired by prosecution of the second action; (2) whether substantially the same evidence is presented in the two actions; (3) whether the two suits involve infringement of the same rights; and (4) whether the two suits arise out of the same transactional nucleus of facts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Finally, Sec. 640d-17(c) provides that individual interests may be litigated in a suit between the two tribes only when those interests are represented by the tribal chairmen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a supplemental proceeding to effectuate a judicial land settlement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.