Adams v. Oj Keller

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1983.

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Adams v. Oj Keller US

Relies on Hockenbury III v. Sowders · Adams v. Oj Keller US

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-09-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2019

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee; Odell Horton, Judge.

ORDER

¶1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

¶2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

¶3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 713 F.2d 1195, is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.