Camby v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 198 · 1983
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. George (1992), Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc. (1985)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United States v. Bailey · United States v. Walters · Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · John B. Hull, Inc. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Within ten days after being served with a copy [of a magistrate judge’s recommendation], any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report ... to which objection is made.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“All of the circuits except one, which have considered the question of waiver have generally found that failure to file objections to a magistrate’s report precludes consideration on appeal of the substance of the report.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wimmer v. Cook“the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stokes v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.