Lucero v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 355 · 1983
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2014
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Texas v. Louisiana · Addington v. Texas · Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal. · White v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he interest of the unsuccessful bar examinee pales by comparison with the interest of the welfare recipient, or even the disability benefits recipient who was found not to deserve a pre-termination hearing in Mathews .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is no evidence that the procedures are unfair, e.g. that the graders engaged in insidious discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would place an intolerable burden upon the Board”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.