Wilson v. Steinhoff’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 550 · 1983
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2011
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Parratt v. Taylor · Abel v. United States · Schwartz v. Public Administrator · Batista v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[pretrial suppression hearing order] was neither a final judgment nor an essential precursor to what was in fact the final judgment, the unappealable judgment of acquittal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has been litigated and determined by a valid final judgment and the determination was essential to the judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.