Minnesota v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 852 · 1983
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably Bowen v. Massachusetts (1988), Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance v. Heckler (1985)
34 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 1102 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1316 (§ 1116 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. Mitchell · Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has significant prospective effect or considerable value apart from merely determining monetary liability of the government.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. C.H. Federal Witness, J.S. Federal Witness, L.J. Federal Witness, W.D. Federal Witness, G.B. Federal Witness, K.H. Federal Witness, J.K. Federal Witness v. John Sullivan, Warden and His Agents (Dick Clark), F.C.I., Sandstone, Mn Edwin Meese, Iii, U.S. Attorney General and His Agents Frederick D. Hess, Director of Office of Enforcement Operations, U.S. Dep't of Justice Gerald Shur, Associate Director, Office of Enforcement Operations, U.S. Dep't of Justice Doug Davis, Administrator, Inmate Monitoring Section (Witsec), U.S. Bureau of Prisons, T.S. Witness v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General Frederick D. Hess, Director, Office of Enforcement Operations Norman Carlson, Director, Bureau of Prisons John Sullivan, Warden, F.C.I., Sandstone Richard Clark, Unit Manager, F.C.I., Sandstone, John Smith (Aka) 02627-030 v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States · United States v. Moseley“issue orders directing restoration to office or position”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. C.H. Federal Witness, J.S. Federal Witness, L.J. Federal Witness, W.D. Federal Witness, G.B. Federal Witness, K.H. Federal Witness, J.K. Federal Witness v. John Sullivan, Warden and His Agents (Dick Clark), F.C.I., Sandstone, Mn Edwin Meese, Iii, U.S. Attorney General and His Agents Frederick D. Hess, Director of Office of Enforcement Operations, U.S. Dep't of Justice Gerald Shur, Associate Director, Office of Enforcement Operations, U.S. Dep't of Justice Doug Davis, Administrator, Inmate Monitoring Section (Witsec), U.S. Bureau of Prisons, T.S. Witness v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General Frederick D. Hess, Director, Office of Enforcement Operations Norman Carlson, Director, Bureau of Prisons John Sullivan, Warden, F.C.I., Sandstone Richard Clark, Unit Manager, F.C.I., Sandstone, John Smith (Aka) 02627-030 v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States · 831 F. Supp. 1154 - Saraco v. Hallett“an institution which . . . is licensed under State law to provide, on a regular basis, health-related care and services to individuals who do not require the degree of care and treatment which a hospital or skilled nursing facility is designed to provide, but who because of their mental or physical condition require care and services (above the level of room and board) which can be made available to them only through institutional facilities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.