United States v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.2d 931 · 1983
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1006 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 657
Relies on Santoni v. United States · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · California v. Southland Royalty Co. · United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. Carlson · United States v. Figueroa-Paz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 1006 provides in pertinent part: Whoever, being an officer, agent or employee of or connected in any capacity with ... any lending, mortgage, insurance, credit or savings and loan corporation or association ... without being duly authorized, draws any order or bill of exchange, makes any acceptance, or issues, puts forth or assigns any note, debenture, bond or other obligation ..., or, with intent to defraud the United States or any agency thereof, or any corporation, institution, or association referred to in this section, participates or shares in or receives directly or indirectly any money, profit, property, or benefits through any transaction, loan, commission, contract, or any other act of any such corporation, institution, or association, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“introduction of prior consistent statements made prior to plea agreement was proper”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that actual disbursement of money is not required under section 657,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.