Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

718 F.2d 971

Docket Nos. 82-3152, 82-3182.

Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 20, 1983.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-10-20

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1986

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Scott v. Clark · Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-10-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson & Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

¶2Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

¶3Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

¶4*972ORDER

¶5Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn.

¶6Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.

/718/f2d/971 · .json · Public domain