Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 F.3d 369 - United States v. Chatmon

United States v. Chatmon’s Empirical Analysis

718 F.3d 369 · 2013

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 4246 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Washington v. Harper · Sell v. United States · United States v. Evans · Miller v. Mercy Hospital, Inc. · United States v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The district] court must conclude that involuntary medication is necessary to further those interests. The court must find that any alternative, less intrusive treatments are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results. Cf. Brief for American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae 10-14 (nondrug therapies may be effective in restoring psychotic defendants to competence); but cf. Brief for American Psychiatric Association et al. as Amici Curiae 13-22 (alternative treatments for psychosis commonly not as effective as medication). And the court must consider less intrusive means for administering the drugs, e.g., a court order to the defendant backed by the contempt power, before considering more intrusive methods.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.