Weiss v. DHL Express, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.3d 39 · 2013
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Fortune v. National Cash Register Co. · J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. Commonwealth · Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Seaco Insurance v. Barbosa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The preclusion of his breach-of-contract claim, moreover, does not mean that Weiss had no recourse but to bow his head and accept the Committee’s decision. As Weiss recognized early in the game, Massachusetts law implies in every contract a covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”). . Obourn does not specifically allege that American Well paid bonuses within the first eight days of 2015. She does, however, allege that she earned an annual bonus for 2014, see . Second Am. Compl. ¶ 28, and, by reference to the Contract, that being”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a]mbiguity arises only if the language is susceptible of more than one meaning and reasonably intelligent persons would differ as to which meaning is the proper one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Optum, Inc. v. Smith“A contract is not ambiguous simply because litigants disagree about its proper interpretation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Optum, Inc. v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.