Shabaj v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.3d 48 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 6 U.S.C. § 557 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System, Inc. · Sharkey v. Quarantillo · Nethagani v. Mukasey · Jun Min Zhang v. Gonzales · Camara v. Department of Homeland Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, while this court would have jurisdiction to review any constitutional claims or questions of law properly raised in a petition for review, the district court did not have jurisdiction to review [plaintiff's] challenge [under § 1252(a)(2)(D) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Nothing in [ § 1252(a)(2)(B) ] ... shall be construed as precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law raised upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no court shall have jurisdiction to review ... any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section ... 1255[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.