Navejar v. Iyiola’s Empirical Analysis
718 F.3d 692 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Edwards v. Balisok · Payne v. Pauley · Pruitt v. Mote · Skrtich v. Thornton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the difficulty of the case-factually and legally-exceeds the particular plaintiff's capacity as a layperson to coherently present it.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[O]nce Navejar was transferred, he faced 'significant problems' in litigating pro se.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.