People v. Hrapski’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2018
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Henderson v. Morgan · People v. Canino · People v. Watkins · Watkins v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Clourts must meticulously avoid any appearance of partiality, not merely to secure the confidence of the litigants immedi ately involved, but to retain public respect and secure willing and ready obedience to their judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Rivas“Jeopardy attached with respect to habitual charges upon the impaneling and swearing of the jury for the initial phase of the defendant's trial on the substantive charge of attempted possession of contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Porter“[t]here is neither an indication that the People intended to delay the proceedings unnecessarily nor is there any indication that the defendant would have been prejudiced by a brief delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Bakari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.