State v. Andreason’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2022
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 30 Utah 2d 54 - State v. Valdez · State v. Troy · State v. Tucker · State v. Roberts · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wlhen the evidence in the record is circumstantial or sufficiently conflicting, jurors are more likely influenced by an improper argument. In such instances, they are more susceptible to the suggestion that factors other than the evidence before them should determine a defendant's guilt or innocence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“everytime we have a jury trial, people are watching. People are watching to see how we administer justice.... [These two Defendants ... are not the only ones we need to be concerned about”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thompson“It is error for a prosecutor to bolster his or her case by implying 'that a jury has an obligation to convict a defendant on some basis other than solely on the evidence before it'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.