Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 P.2d 403 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2012

20 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Robbins · State v. Jones · State v. Breckenridge · Warner v. Morris · Brooks v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an appellant fails to provide an adequate record on appeal, this Court must assume the regularity of the proceedings below.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty or no contest, and may not accept the plea until the court has found: [[Image here]] (d) the defendant understands the nature and elements of the offense to which he is entering the plea; that upon trial the prosecution would have the burden of proving each of those elements beyond a reasonable doubt; and that the plea is an admission of all those elements ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entered his plea with full knowledge and understanding of its consequences and of the rights he was waiving, including his right against self-incrimination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.