Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 P2D 41 - MacLaird v. State

MacLaird v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2011

14 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Brown v. United States · New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa · Coloma Community School District v. Berry · National Theatres Corp. v. Bertha Building Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The credibility of a defendant in a criminal case may be tested and his testimony impeached like that of any other witness. When he testifies in his own behalf he has no right to set forth to the jury facts favorable to him without laying himself open to cross-examination upon those facts. Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148 , 78 S.Ct. 622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 , reh. denied 356 U.S. 948 , 78 S.Ct. 776 , 2 L.Ed.2d 822 (1958)." (Emphasis added.) MacLaird v. State, Wyo., 718 P.2d 41, 47 (1986).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]oth counsel tried to have the last word, and it was difficult for the attorneys to let go of appellant. Defense counsel pursued what might loosely be called re-redirect examination. The prosecutor did not try re-recross examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.