718 So. 2d 1107 - Wall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 792 So. 2d 192 - Mitchell v. State (2001), Jordan v. State (2001)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Solem v. Helm · Rummel v. Estelle · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sentencing is within the complete discretion of the trial court and not subject to appellate review if it is within the limits prescribed by statute.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[A]ll evidence introduced by the State is to be accepted as true, together with any reasonable inferences that can be drawn from that evidence.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Taggart v. State · Conners v. State“(i) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (ii) the sentence imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; and (iii) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. State · Thomas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.