Randall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · Joiner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the explanation is facially raceneutral and the court believes that, given all the circumstances surrounding the strike, the explanation is not a pretext, the strike will be sustained. The court's focus in step 3 is not on the reasonableness of the explanation but rather its genuineness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Foster v. State“clearly erred in finding that the state's proffered reason for striking [the] juror . . . was genuine or non-pretextual”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.