Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 So. 2d 283 - Romano v. State

718 So. 2d 283 - Romano v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2019

11 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Davis v. State · Hopping v. State · Shuman v. State · 697 So. 2d 164 - Republic Nat. Bank v. Araujo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the conviction is for an offense involving sexual contact which includes sexual penetration, the sexual penetration must be scored as a severe injury regardless of whether there is evidence of any physical injury. If the conviction is for an offense involving sexual contact which does not include sexual penetration, the sexual contact must be scored as a moderate injury regardless of whether there is evidence of any physical injury. If the victim of an offense involving sexual contact suffers any physical injury as a direct result of the primary offense or any other offense committed by the offender resulting in conviction, .such physical injury must be scored separately and in addition to the points scored for the sexual contact or the sexual penetration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he Legislature finds that the least serious sexual battery offense, which is provided in s. 794.011 (5), was intended, and remains intended, to serve as the basic charge of sexual battery * * * and that it was never intended that the sexual battery offense described in s. 794.011 (5) require any force or violence beyond the force and violence that is inherent in the accomplishment of `penetration' or `union.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.