Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 SO2D 318 - State v. Ridgway

State v. Ridgway’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Horton v. California · Scott v. United States · United States v. Hale · 548 So. 2d 846 - State v. Weber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contraband not listed in a search warrant may be seized if found in accordance with the “plain view” doctrine during the course of the search. It must be readily apparent that the items are contraband. It is no longer necessary that the discovery of the unlisted evidence be inadvertent. In this case, the officers were justified in opening the photo albums to search for additional drugs, paraphernalia, or written evidence of drug transactions. As soon as the albums were open, at a minimum, it was readily apparent that the photographs could be seized as evidence of Mr. Ridgway’s lewd and lascivious conduct with a child. The remaining photographs were also lawfully found during the search. Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting this motion to suppress the photographs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.