718 So. 2d 592 - Roger v. Dufrene’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 639 So. 2d 216 - Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv. · Blanchard v. Ogima · Barnes v. Thames · 639 So. 2d 224 - Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of Amtrak, and that the prejudice created by the admission of the documents had a substantial effect on the outcome of the case. The proper inquiry for determining whether a party was prejudiced by a trial court's alleged erroneous ruling is whether the alleged error, when compared to the entire record, had a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.