State v. Kirvin’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2025
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 43 U.S.C. § 1301 (Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act) · 43 U.S.C. § 1311 · 43 U.S.C. § 1312
Relies on Michel v. United States · United States v. Postal · United States v. Alaska · 576 So. 2d 1310 - Perkins v. State · 604 So. 2d 471 - Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We first consider the challenge to article X, sections 16(b)(1) and (c)(1), Florida Constitution. As the State asserts, these provisions are not unconstitutionally vague.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nichols“whether the statute can be fairly used to proscribe the defendant's [or respondent's] conduct, and the result is not binding on other parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“means one or more walls of netting which captures saltwater finfish by ensnaring or entangling them in the meshes of the net by the gills, and”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nichols
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.