Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 718 S.W.2d 409 - Blocker v. State

Blocker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2017

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kentucky River Mills v. Jackson · Slay v. Burnett Trust · 40 Cal. 2d 852 - Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical Society · Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A. · Hutcherson v. Sovereign Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. The assets of a corporation in the process of dissolution shall be applied and distributed as follows: (3) Assets received and held by the corporation subject to limitations permitting their use only for charitable, religious, eleemosynary, benevolent, educational or similar purposes, but not held upon a condition requiring return, transfer or conveyance by reason of the dissolution, together with any income earned thereon, shall be transferred or conveyed to one or more domestic or foreign corporations, societies or organizations engaged in activities substantially similar to those of the dissolving corporation, pursuant to a plan of distribution adopted as provided in this Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because a charitable corporation is organized for the benefit of the public, and not for private profit or for its own benefit, the public has a beneficial interest in all property of a public benefit, non-profit corporation. Such a corporation has legal title to the property but may use it only in furtherance of its charitable purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.