Commonwealth v. Rohrer’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 433 Pa. Super. 111 - Commonwealth v. Quinlan · Zontek v. Brown · 450 Pa. Super. 105 - Commonwealth v. Genovese · 289 Pa. Super. 22 - Commonwealth v. Koziel · 439 Pa. Super. 616 - Commonwealth v. Magnum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as otherwise provided or proscribed by law, a court upon notice to the parties may modify or rescind any order within 30 days after its entry, notwithstanding the prior termination of any term of court, if no appeal from such order has been taken or allowed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the result would be the same” under Rule 1411 because the Commonwealth failed to file either timely post-sentence motions or a timely direct appeal with this Court. Id. We noted that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.