Keller v. Re/Max Centre Realty’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shane v. Hoffmann · Sack v. Feinman · Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc. · In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of Berks · 402 Pa. Super. 101 - Moran v. G. & W.H. Corson, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The grant of a stay of execution is within the sound discretion of the trial court and its decision will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of that discretion." In Re Upset Sale, Tax Claim Bureau of Berks County , 505 Pa. 327 , 339, 479 A.2d 940 , 946 (1984) ; Kronz v. Kronz , 393 Pa.Super. 227 , 574 A.2d 91 , 94 (1990). A court, in exercising this power, should not stay an execution unless the facts warrant an exercise of judicial discretion. Kronz , supra . Appellate review of equitable matters is limited to a determination of whether the trial court committed an error of law or abused its discretion. Marra v. Stocker , 532 Pa. 187 , 192, 615 A.2d 326 , 328 (1992) (citing Sack v. Feinman , 489 Pa. 152 , 413 A.2d 1059 (1980) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.