Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

719 A.2d 497

In re Gordon

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1998

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1998-11-05

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2014

6 state decisions

Relies on Matter of Addams · In Re Day

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-11-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1In this reciprocal discipline proceeding, the Board recommends that respondent be disbarred.* Respondent has taken no exception to the recommendation, which we accept. See In re Day, 717 A.2d 883 (D.C.1998); In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190 (D.C.1990) (en banc).

¶2Accordingly, respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. The period of disbarment shall commence when respondent files the affidavit required by D.C.Bar Rule XI, § 14(g) (1998); see also id., § 16(c). In the meantime, respondent shall remain suspended.

¶3So ordered.

¶4Respondent consented to indefinite suspension in Maryland on the basis of eight ethical complaints charging him with, among other things, deceitful handling of funds represented to be in escrow and misuse of client funds.

/719/a2d/497 · .json · Public domain