Liket v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Weatherford v. Bursey · Gray v. Netherland · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the testimony or background of a witness offers no exculpatory value, the State does not have to disclose the identity of that witness prior to that witness’ testimony.”). 27 . Lovett v. State, 516 A.2d 455, 472 (Del. 1986) (quoting Moore v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 786, 795 , 92 S.Ct. 2562 , 33 L.Ed.2d 706 (1972)). 28 . App. to Answering Br. at 11. 29 . See Super. Ct.Crim. R. 16(a)(1)(C) (providing that,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goode v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.