Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 719 F.2d 122 - Baber v. Edman

Baber v. Edman’s Empirical Analysis

719 F.2d 122 · 1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2022

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woods v. Holy Cross Hospital · Schepps v. Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas · Conway v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. · Schepps v. Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This procedural requirement must be met before a medical malpractice claim grounded on Texas law can be filed in a federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction. The Texas legislature’s purposes were to encourage the settlement of disputes without litigation and to curb the rising costs of medical malpractice insurance and health care. The legislature intended the notice statute to bind federal courts in Texas, for it would frustrate the purposes of the statute for diversity plaintiffs to neglect furnishing their potential defendants with notice of their intent to file suit and the attendant opportunity to settle in advance of expensive litigation. The notice statute is so intertwined with Texas’s substantive policy on medical malpractice actions that, to give that policy full effect, federal courts sitting in diversity must enforce its requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.