United States v. Ackerman

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 21, 1983.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-11-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1999

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Johnson · United States v. Ackerman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1983-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Linda Broocks (Court-appointed), Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

¶2 *1283Ronald C.H. Eddins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4(Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir.1983, 704 F.2d 1344).

¶5Before BROWN, GOLDBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:.

¶7Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No . member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. See United States v. Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324, n. 20 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (1981).