Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 719 F.2d 1539 - United States v. Luis-Gonzalez

United States v. Luis-Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis

719 F.2d 1539 · 1983

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Walton (1993), United States v. Alvarez (1985)

34 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

33019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 14 U.S.C. § 89 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 955A

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Glasser v. United States · Blockburger v. United States · Pinkerton v. United States · Brown v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We conclude from the unambiguous language of section 955a(a)-(d) and the absence of any evidence of a contrary intention in the legislative history that subsections (a) through (d) of 21 U.S.C. § 955a state separate offenses for which separate convictions may be obtained.” 4”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A refusal to deliver a requested jury instruction is reversible error only if the instruction (1) is substantially correct, (2) is not substantially covered by others delivered, and (3) concerns an important point in the trial so that the failure to give it seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to present a given defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “merely establish separate criteria by which jurisdiction of vessels on the high seas may be obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.