United States v. Crowder’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.2d 166 · 1983
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Gillard (1988), State v. Joly (1991)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2313
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Doyle v. Ohio · Sandstrom v. Montana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Doyle rule has no application unless the defendant has remained silent and could be considered to have done so in reliance on the implied assurances of the Miranda warnings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hendrix v. Palmer · State v. Bass“little or no application to any contested issue in the case”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his was not a claim of the right not to speak, but a reiteration [by the defendant] of his previous story.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hendrix v. Palmer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.