Lannon v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.2d 518 · 1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2019
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Cupp v. Naughten · Rideout v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“you may infer or conclude that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“imply denigration or disbelief of a defendant's testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“such as intent or knowledge from proof of a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.