Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 719 F.2d 683 - House v. National Labor Relations Board

House v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

719 F.2d 683 · 1983

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2014

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Katz · Tisdale v. United States · American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. National Labor Relations Board · Crist v. Crist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n the complex realm of industrial relations `few issues are less suited to appellate judicial appraisal than evaluation of bargaining processes or better suited to the expert experience of a board which deals constantly with such problems.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A concession by one party on a significant issue in dispute precludes a finding of impasse even if a wide gap between the parties remains because under such circumstances there is reason to believe that further bargaining might produce additional movement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when impasse occurs, the employer is free to implement changes in employment terms unilaterally so long as the changes have been previously offered to the Union during bargaining”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.