Goldstein v. Galvin’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.3d 16 · 2013
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Kentucky v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the parties to the prior and present actions must either be identical or in privity; the causes of action must arise out of the same nucleus of operative fact; and the prior action must have produced a final judgment on the merits.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a person who is sued in one capacity (whether official or individual) cannot - 23 - assert a defense of claim preclusion in a later action in which he is sued in a different capacity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a public official, sued only in his official capacity, is a proxy for the government entity that employs him and is in privity with that entity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.