United States v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.3d 369 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Padilla v. Kentucky · Lafler v. Cooper · United States v. Auten · United States v. Cavitt · United States v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, this requirement must be understood practically, in the context of the claim being presented,” Reed, 719 F.3d at 373 , and is inapplicable to this case. The requirement of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.