United States v. Windless’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.3d 415 · 2013
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 42 U.S.C. § 16901 (Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006) · 42 U.S.C. § 16911
Relies on Gall v. United States · Pearson v. Callahan · Pepper v. United States · Pepper v. United States · United States v. Delgado-Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] district court has discretion to craft conditions of [SR], even if the Guidelines do not recommend those conditions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“note[d] that here, the defendant committed the underlying sex offense when he was only fifteen years old, and that this condition would prevent him from ever seeing his minor children without the supervision of someone approved by a probation officer.” Id. 30 .In our earlier decision in United States v. Paul, 274 F.3d 155 (5th Cir.2001), we addressed a similar condition prohibiting”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.