Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
719 F.3d 689 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. · Milner v. Department of the Navy · Milner v. Department of the Navy · Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. Rumsfeld
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the public benefit derived from the case; (2) the commercial benefit to the requester; (3) the nature of the requester's interest in the information, and (4) the reasonableness of the agency's conduct.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrary and inconsistent with the structure and purposes of FOIA.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Davy v. CIA , 550 F.3d 1155 , 1159 (D.C. Cir. 2008), but”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.