Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 719 FSUPP 760 - Pennington v. Hobson

Pennington v. Hobson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2015

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mathews v. Eldridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As this Court has previously stated: Qualified immunity is a fact-sensitive issue, and it is determined by an objective, rather than a subjective standard: immunity turned on whether a reasonable official in the defendant’s position at the time the cause of action arose would have known that the challenged conduct violated a clearly established right. Further, the right allegedly violated must be defined with specificity—a plaintiff cannot defeat the defense of immunity by asserting that the defendants violated some broad constitutional precept.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonable police officers [were] on notice that the Constitution proscribed intentional deprivations of liberty in the face of clearly exculpatory evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.