719 F. Supp. 2d 843 - Corbis Corp. v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc. · Biegas v. Quickway Carriers, Inc. · United States v. Dakota · In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America v. Under Seal · Humphreys, Hutcheson & Moseley v. Donovan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“quarter hour billing and conclusory descriptions 'invite downward adjustment' of attorney's fees”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.