Ewing v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · Tawney v. State · Grassmyer v. State · Taylor v. State · Humphrey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to make a prima facie showing of a violation of the Sixth Amendment's fair cross-section requirement, a defendant must establish: (1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a 'distinetive' group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (8) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'BANION v. State“for purposes of the fair cross-section requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'BANION v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.