Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. State · Wright v. State · Mitchem v. State · Widener v. State · Morgan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the same evidence that supported the murder conviction, the act of stabbing, may have also been used to convict Defendant of robbery as a Class A felony.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Spivey v. State · Oldham v. State“[Two or more offenses are the 'same offense' ... if, with respect to either the statutory elements of the challenged crimes or the actual evidence used to convict, the essential elements of one challenged offense also establish the essential elements of another challenged offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not establish it as a separate crime, but merely as a separate basis of liability for the crime charged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Porter v. State · Taylor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.