People v. Archuleta’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2013
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · People v. Thiret · People v. Ramirez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tihe roadside questioning of a motorist detained pursuant to a routine traffic stop does not necessarily constitute 'custodial interrogation' for the purpose of the rule established in Mi-ramnda.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Taylor · People v. Null“sufficiently impair[ ] [Defendant's] exercise of his privilege against self incrimination to require that he be warned of his constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Taylor“a motorist's freedom of action is curtailed to a 'degree associated with formal arrest,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.