Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 719 P.2d 83 - Rose v. Allied Development Co.

Rose v. Allied Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2008

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

90198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Perry v. Sindermann · 102 Wash. 2d 219 - Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company · Bowen v. Riverton City · 11 Utah 2d 1 - Bullock v. Deseret Dodge Truck Center, Inc. · 46 Wash. 2d 408 - Lasser v. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, where an employee is fired in a manner or for a reason that contravenes a recognized and established public policy, the at-will rule will not serve to insulate the employer from liability. Second, courts have clarified the requirements for finding an express or implied contract term for employment for a certain period or a covenant for dismissal only with cause. Finally, many courts have relied upon the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and have granted the discharged employee a cause of action to sue when the employer’s conduct breaches that implied covenant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment must be supported by evidence, admissions, and inferences which when viewed in the light most favorable to the losing side establish that 'there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]o satisfy the 'good consideration' exception ..., [the employee] would have had to offer [his employer], at its request, something more than what he was already obligated to do under his employment agreement, not just a continuation of the duties he was required to perform.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.