¶1We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand for the trial court to reduce to writing its reasons and the evidence relied upon for the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Salvatierra v. State, 691 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Because this will be purely a ministerial act, appellant’s presence will be unnecessary. See Culliver v. State, 693 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Boggs v. State, 557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
719 So. 2d 1032
Bingham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 4, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-11-04
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1999
1 state decisions
Relies on 557 So. 2d 203 - Johnson v. State · Salvatierra v. State · Dunlap v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-11-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →