719 So. 2d 269 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2015
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Yarber · B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Butler · 56 Ala. App. 704 - English v. State · English v. State · 493 So. 2d 1362 - Ex Parte Otinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`"[T]he trial court is not bound to accept an agreement between the defense and the prosecution." Ex parte Yarber , 437 So.2d 1330 , 1336 (Ala. 1983). However, "`when the trial judge decides not to carry out an agreement reached between the prosecutor and defense counsel, the accused must be afforded the opportunity to withdraw his or her guilty plea on motion promptly made.'" Bland v. State , 565 So.2d 1240 , 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), quoting Ex parte Otinger , 493 So.2d 1362 , 1364 (Ala. 1986).'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Faulkner v. State“[a]fford the defendant the opportunity to withdraw the defendant's offer to plead guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.